Insights

Microsoft 365 vs European alternatives: an honest field guide

Microsoft 365 is the default for a reason: it is deep, polished and everywhere. But “default” and “right for you” are different claims, and for a growing number of businesses the sovereignty question makes the European alternatives worth a serious look. This is a field guide, not a crusade — here is where each genuinely fits.

Where Microsoft 365 earns its place

Be honest about its strengths, because they are real:

  • Office depth — for heavy Excel, complex Word documents and PowerPoint, the desktop apps are still unmatched.
  • Ecosystem — Teams, SharePoint, Entra ID and the compliance tooling form a tightly integrated whole.
  • Interoperability — when your clients and partners all live in Office formats, friction is low.

If your team lives in those apps and your sector expects them, M365 is a defensible, sensible choice. The sovereignty caveat is the familiar one: it is a US provider, and even with the EU Data Boundary, the CLOUD Act exposure does not vanish.

The European alternatives, by job

“Replace Microsoft 365” is rarely one product — it is a handful of focused tools. The credible European options, grouped by what they do:

Mail, calendar and productivity suites

  • Infomaniak kSuite (Switzerland) — mail, calendar, drive and online documents from a privacy-focused Swiss provider.
  • Proton (Switzerland) — end-to-end encrypted mail, calendar, drive and a password manager, strong for privacy-first teams.
  • Open-Xchange / Mailbox.org / Tuta (Germany) — mature European mail and groupware.

Documents and collaboration

  • OnlyOffice and Collabora Online — genuinely capable office-document editing with strong Microsoft-format compatibility.
  • Nextcloud (Germany) — files, sharing, groupware and an app ecosystem you can self-host for full control.

How to actually choose

The decision is rarely about feature checklists. It comes down to a few honest questions:

  • How deep is your real dependence on Excel and desktop Office? Light users move easily; power users feel every gap.
  • How much does sovereignty matter for your data and your sector — a genuine requirement, or a nice-to-have?
  • What is the switching cost in migration, training and interoperability with the partners you can't change?
  • Self-hosted, or a managed European cloud? Control versus convenience, the same trade-off as everywhere else.

Our advice is unglamorous: don't rip out M365 on principle, and don't stay on it by inertia. Match the tool to the job and the sovereignty requirement — sometimes that is a clean move to a European suite, sometimes a hybrid, and sometimes a well-run M365 tenant is the right answer. What matters is that it's a decision, not a default.

Frequently asked questions

Is Microsoft 365 a bad choice now?
No. It is excellent software with real strengths, especially for Office-heavy teams. The question is whether its US-provider sovereignty profile fits your data and sector — for many it does, for others a European alternative is the better match.
Can European tools really replace Office?
For most everyday document work, yes — OnlyOffice and Collabora handle Microsoft formats well. The honest exception is heavy, advanced Excel and certain desktop-only features, where Office still leads. Match the tool to how your team actually works.
What about Teams?
This is often the stickiest piece. Alternatives exist (Nextcloud Talk, Jitsi, Element), but if your organisation lives in Teams, plan that part of any move carefully — it is usually the hardest habit to replace.
Should we self-host or use a managed European cloud?
Self-hosting (e.g. Nextcloud) gives maximum control; a managed European provider (e.g. Infomaniak) gives convenience under European jurisdiction. The right answer depends on your appetite for operations — and we are happy to run either for you.
All insights

Tell us about your project.

A few lines about the business and the challenge is enough to begin. We read every message and reply personally — within 24 hours.